Brainspotting as a Neuroexperienial Process for Healing Expansion: David Grand

8th December 2023

Brainspotting as a Neuroexperiential Process for Healing and Expansion 

Here we are. Over 1,200 Brainspotting practitioners together at the same time. Most of us are therapists  but some of us come from other healing modalities. Eighteen years ago I walked into my office unaware,  as far as I knew, that a life-changing, paradigm-shifting experience was coming my way, and ultimately  our way. I called myself a psychotherapist and I suppose in most ways I still do. But that momentous day  in March 2003 began a process that changed me both neocortically and subcortically. This pertains to my  perceptions, my beliefs, my concepts, my language and ultimately my practice. Before that day of  discovery, that moment of discovery, my conceptualizations and language were essentially derived from  psychology, psychotherapy, psychopathology, diagnosis and treatment. However, in relation to all these  stated aspects, my day of discovery provided an arc that bent and folded everything for me forevermore.  It was the birth of the neuroexperiential model that I am presenting to you today. 

Perhaps that’s not entirely accurate. Maybe I’m giving my neocortex too much credit and my subcortex  not enough. My subcortex was living and breathing in it’s own neuroexperiential processes, as it had  been in utero and birth right up to these unfolding moments of my presentation to you. And the same  applies to all of your subcortices that are neuroexperientially receiving, perceiving and metabolizing the  felt sense wisdom my words carry, reifying what your subcortices already intuitively know. It is the  neocortex that seeks to observe, define, refine, categorize and name what the subcortex already knows  and knew intuitively. The wise neocortex understands that it is only as knowledgeable as the information  it receives from the knowing subcortex. The foolhardy neocortex believes it derives it’s own wisdom from  within itself. That is a foolscap believing it is actually the head that it sits upon. The wise neocortex knows  that it’s informational perceptions all derive from sensory perceptions. “It is what it is” long before “it is  what it means”. The self-absorbed neocortex believes that it’s informational perceptions stand on their  own. Accordingly, my subcortex already knew the salience of an eye wobble to the unprocessed trauma it  both revealed and expressed. But on that day, my neocortex was compelled to notice and focus on the  skater’s profound eye wobble, freeze and the ten minutes of lightning fast, life-changing processing that  ensued. My neocortex wondered whether this was the opening of a new door, a breakthrough, however,  my subcortex already knew it was. My neocortex took confirmation from the skater’s report the next  morning that the triple loop came to her effortlessly. My subcortex needed no confirmation because it  already intuitively knew itself and it’s own myriad mechanisms, as well of that of the skater. When each of  you attended your Brainspotting Phase 1 trainings, your subcortex already intuitively knew what your 

neocortex was to informationally learn at the training. The paradigm shift to come was in your neocortex,  not your subcortex. So why was this new information you learned about uncertainty, frames, eye positions  and focused mindfulness so unsettling and confusing to your neocortex? Perhaps because of all the  information it was fed starting in undergraduate and graduate school. 

Modern psychology is seen as beginning in the late 1800’s with the foundational work of Sigmund Freud,  Pierre Janet, William James and countless others. The 1900’s saw the expansion of psychoanalysis and  it’s offshoots, the birth of behaviorism and the evolution of clinical and experimental psychologies.  Academic and research psychology brought evidence-based practice to the fore. The late 20th century  brought attention to the prominence of body and brain processes and their centrality to our human  experiences, and their interruptions, but these brain-body fundamentals existed primarily on the periphery  on the field of psychology. We are now early in the third decade of the 21st century, so where are we?  Despite the advances across the board in science, the digital age and social media, our universities,  research laboratories, training programs, licensing boards, institutions providing therapy and insurance  companies paying for it, are often mired in the increasingly outmoded concepts and language of not only  the 20th century but even the 19th century. The DSM 5, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental  Disorders, is the reference material our fields rely on in many parts of the world. Reflect with me for the  moment on it’s name: diagnostic….statistical….manual….mental….disorders. What do these words truly  mean? How do these terms fit with the words we employ in Brainspotting: uncertainty, frames,  attunement, presence, body awareness, neurobiology, relevant eye positions, focused mindfulness,  dysregulation to regulation, attachment disruption, developmental trauma and survival/adaptive  dissociation? The current lexicon, the language of our fields, which reflect the conceptualizations of our  fields, provides little that relates to with what we see, and know and do with Brainspotting. Yet all of us,  including myself, are still operating, explicitly and implicitly, from the outdated and incongruent language  and concepts of our field’s histories. How is the term psychology defined? APA posits that “psychology is  the study of the mind and behavior”, which is close to the definition provided by the Merriam Webster  Dictionary which states, “the mental or behavioral characteristics of an individual or group”. Merriam  Webster additionally defines psychotherapy as, “treatment of mental or emotional disorder or of related  bodily ills by psychological means”. The words mind and mental lack clarity, relevance and groundedness  in the context of Brainspotting. In fact, I’ve spent my entire career unsuccessfully trying to figure out what  the mystifying words “mind” and “mental” actually mean, or at least what their relevance is to what I see  and do in supporting people to heal. Disorder is a judgmental and blame-shifting term society gives for 

trauma-wound manifestations derived from the cruelties that befall the young and the vulnerable. Psyche  in ancient Greek means breath, spirit or soul, however where are these derivatives present on the  licensing exams for psychologists or psychotherapists? The answer is obvious. They are not. 

Although I discovered Brainspotting 18 years ago and have been progressively developing, with the input  of many others from around the globe, the theories, practices and language of Brainspotting, it is only in  the last year that I have arrived at the designation of the Neuroexperiential Model, for Brainspotting, and  for other healing modalities that wish to explore this concept. The name neuroexperiential, and all it holds,  didn’t come to me quickly, directly or easily. In fact, I wasn’t fully aware that I was searching for it.  Perhaps it’s that I’m simply not capable of thinking in the context of conventional wisdom, which can be  an asset or a deficit, or that I rely on my subcortex more than most people appear to. My subcortex knew  that you call something by what it is, not by what it was, and not by what others tell you it is. You call  something by what it is. Brainspotting gives a name to what we do, but it doesn’t describe what  Brainspotting does, and what conditions and situations it works with. The words psychology,  psychotherapy, treatment, “mental model” or “model of the mind” don’t suffice. Freud’s topographical (pre structural) model of unconscious, preconscious and conscious begins to approach what we do, although  it addresses the mind and ignores the brain and the body. The bottom-up neuroexperiential starts with the  nervous system in the body and rises towards conscious awareness and being. 

The word “neuroexperiential” came to me before I had a chance to think of it; it was a true subcortical gift.  I knew it was right but I didn’t know why, at first. So I pondered it and meditated on it and invited my  neocortex to do it’s work, reviewing the words and the concepts my neocortex came up with, that I am  presenting to you today. Neuro is of the nervous system, the neurobiology, the brain and the body which  are primarily unconscious, out of our conscious reach. Experiential pertains to that which arises to and  resides within our conscious awareness. To my observation, the foundation of the experiential is the  sensory: sight, sound, feel, smell and taste. It is important to note that the brain receives the sensory  input and creates a simulation of it, so what feels real is actually an internally created reality. In addition, it appears that our senses are much more attuned to our internal environment, or our felt sense, than our  sensations or perceptions are of the world outside of us, our outer environment. From the sensory, the felt  sense, flows the emotional and the intuitive, which are intertwined closely together. The emotional refers  to the flow of our transient feelings, about ourselves and others, our past, our present and our imagined  future. Emotions, in my opinion, are rooted in the primal, fear and anger deriving from flight and fight, love 

deriving from core attachments, and joy reflecting the expansive possibility of our one to four quadrillion synaptic connections. The intuitive is what we know, simply because we know it. It derives from our  instinctual animal heritage, a guide for how to survive and thrive in our dynamic, unpredictable  environments. The intuitive appears to be a limbic process with autonomic underpinnings, ultimately  flowing towards the neocortical, but not there yet. Perhaps the distribution of neurons throughout the body  provides insight into intuitive input; the spine, the peripheral nervous system, the enteric (digestive)  nervous system, the cardiac nervous system and perhaps other yet to be discovered body systems. All  these yield the intuitive, gut, heart, energic, generational and apparently psychic manifestations and  awarenesses. Accordingly the intuitive is part neuro and part experiential, the way station Freud called  the preconscious, the netherworld of self-presence. As the sensory, emotional and intuitive rise towards  expanded conscious awareness, they begin to attract the attention of the neocortex. What is this? Where  does this come from? What does this mean? What does this tell me about my world and myself? What  words might best describe this? and ultimately; Where do I go with this? In this accurate, receptive  process, the neocortical plays a crucial role in the experiential evolution. In Brainspotting, we are taught to  devote most of our efforts to bypassing the neocortex, to not get bogged down in the language and  thoughts that play no role in regulation. There is, however, a clear place for the neocortical in the  experiential aspect of Brainspotting. Frontloading and backloading information are meant to engage the  neocortex in anticipating before, and reviewing after, the process that is bookmarked in between. The  parting question to the client, “what’s your takeaway from this session” guides their neocortex to reflect  and then continue reviewing the ensuing post-session processing. 

Let us return to the neuro piece of the Neuroexperiential Model. It might seem that my choice of the term  “neuro” might appear to delimit the concept solely to the mechanisms of the nervous system. This is not  my intention. It is my choice to stretch the term neuro from a solely Western conception of physiology to  an expansive, permeable frame that encompasses all historical and present day healing wisdom. I have  

been quoted as saying that “Brainspotting is where East meets West and West meets East”, implying that  my background as a Westerner should not in any way preclude Eastern wisdom, healing and philosophy  from informing and infusing itself into Brainspotting. An example of this resides in another quote of mine,  “you don’t have to know what it is to know that it is”. Even though I am not highly knowledgeable in the  various energy healing modalities and practices, they are highly congruent with Brainspotting and are  definitely inside the neuro frame I am presenting here. The same applies to Indigenous wisdom and  healing practices, which are not coincidently found historically distributed throughout the world, as they 

rely on the evolved, collective intuitions of millions, shared and developed over centuries and millennia.  This Indigenous knowing fits perfectly into the neuro frame through observing, attuning, waiting and  sharing with others who are doing the same. Brainspotting is mindful of being open, curious and  respectful of the ideas and practices of others. It is for those in the Brainspotting community who possess  knowledge of Eastern and Indigenous wisdom and practices, to contribute to and build on the  neuroexperiential model. We evolve by sharing our collective wisdom, as such following the tale of the  comet together, wherever it ventures. 

Does this mean that when it comes to the neuro, anything goes? Of course not. Everything is received,  perceived and held in the superordinate Brainspotting Frame comprised of all of it’s integrative  components. It should be noted that Brainspotting practitioners often ask in trainings and discussion lists,  “what is the set up for?” a variety of conditions or situations, when in fact the more accurate question is,  “what is the frame for?” The set up only serves to, step by step, focus and activate in the service of frame  development. In fact, the inchoate frame exists within the client long before they seek out therapy. It is the  felt sense of dysregulation that is the genesis of the client’s journey towards pursuing healing. Something  is, or feels, not right and the client is unable to understand, determine or figure out how to right or resolve  it. The dysregulation has to be painful, disruptive and inhibiting enough, for long enough, for the client to  take the courageous steps towards and into the healing process. Brainspotting takes the view that the  inability to move reflexively from dysregulation to regulation can be found in subcortical dissociative  barriers formed during sustained developmental trauma, which are further calcified by repeated, accumulated adult traumas; retraumatizations that reverberate back to the original preverbal, intra-uterine  and generational traumas. Brainspotting is directly trauma and dissociation informed, duly attuned to the  substrates of all symptomatic and behavioral manifestations. The particular dysregulated felt sense  possessed by each individual, reflects the frame in it’s earliest formation. This frame forms and develops  until the potential client cries out, “enough is enough, I can’t live this way anymore!” Brainspotting  therapists know that the client brings their own personal, uniquely developed frame with them into their  initial session. As we greet them, as we listen openly and intently, as they spontaneously reveal their  story, the client is gently, yet tentatively, extending their frame out to us as we receive it. We hold their  frame with them and develop it together. By doing so we are creating with them a space that enables  them to innately and intuitively verge from dysregulation to regulation, not in a linear fashion, but in a  series of unpredictable spirals that mirror the neural processes of exploring and expressing. This is a  quintessential neuroexperiential process. 

What we Brainspotting therapists call the set up starts with an invitation to the client; “what would you like  to work on today?” This is another way of asking, “what neuroexperiential frame have you brought into  todays session?” Other modalities may require that the choice of issue fit into certain categories,  parameters or targets. This demands that the client to fit into predetermined frames, and reflects a lack of  attunement and openness on the part of the practitioner and their model. The neuroexperiential approach  understands, respects and supports the client’s internal and intuitive wisdom of knowing and identifying  the deeply personal and individual sense of what burdens them. The neuroexperiential model also knows  and respects the subcortical, nonverbal and somatic quality of the client’s presentation. That’s why  Brainspotting practitioners don’t immediately ask for extensive history, detail and client impressions. We  ask, “are you activated around this issue?” We mindfully use the designation “activation” because it is a  frank, neuroexperiential term neutrally reflecting nervous system activation, intentionally steering clear of meaning and connotation. There is no “too much” or “not enough” activation as it is what it should be  within the client’s perception and experience. If the activation is low and the client appears stable, we may  encourage them to activate themselves, a sort of initial squeezing of the lemon. Regardless, whatever the  level of activation is, we trust and accept it and move ahead to taking the SUDs, Subjective Units of  Disturbance Scale, rating activation from zero to ten. This rating process numerically engages the  neocortical aspect of the conscious experiential. It carries no meaning, rating in a similar fashion to the  gradations of a thermometer. Despite being subjective, the SUDs provides a numerical assessment that  can be revisited throughout, or at the conclusion of the session. If during the processing the SUDs rises, it  does not indicate a problem, rather the locating and approaching of dissociative barriers protecting  unprocessed trauma. This elevation of the SUDs level actually reflects that the process is working by  finding it’s way to and into trauma buried deep in the subcortex. Following the SUDs we ask, “where do  you feel the activation in your body now?” This is a purely neuroexperiential question devoid of any  psychological aspect or intent. It is akin to a medical doctor asking, “where does it hurt?” We accept  whatever the client reflects back to us as they know their system best, from the inside out. As the client is  observing the activation in their body, their visual systems are simultaneously responding with eye  reflexes, orienting and spontaneous gaze. Brainspotting therapists quickly move to observe and harness  these ocular phenomena, with or without a pointer. This gains subcortical access down to the midbrain  level of the visual layer of the superior colliculi, finding the right file and holding it open by maintaining the  fixed gaze. This is an incredibly neuro process within the neuroexperiential and forms a frame capable of  a powerful focused mindfulness healing journey. 

Although Brainspotting therapists select either Outside Window, Inside Window or Gazespotting, all three  are simultaneously present and can be accessed with all clients. We have yet to determine if all three  express or access separate or overlapping neuro-ocular systems. Outside Window gains perhaps the  deepest access to the activated nervous system as the reflexes in the eyes, face and body are almost  entirely beyond the client’s awareness. These reflexes emanate from the brainstem and the spinal cord,  which are purely neurological and devoid of psychological meaning, interpretation and discourse. Clients  queried at the end of an Outside Window process will frequently say, “I have no idea why you stopped  there but it felt right”, a neuroexperiental observation indeed. Inside Window was named as such because  the client chooses the spot from their inside observation of the highest activation, or groundedness in the  case of the Resource Model. Despite the client’s conscious participation, it may well be that they are  observing internally discharged reflexes that are not observable to the therapist. The increased  respiration and circulation, the muscle tightening and the pain intensification are all reflexive expressions  that redound to the brainstem and spine as in Outside Window. Yet the client’s greater awareness of  these reflexes reflects that the experiential is also present with the neuro, receiving and observing the  rising and emerging sensations from the deep regions of the soma. Inside Window manifests the orienting  reflex which both alerts us to potential danger, as well as possibility including sustenance, and social  engagement. Accordingly, Inside Window is a highly somatic process where not only the eyes orient left,  right, up and down, but the head, neck, torso and whole body also shifts and turns. Gazespotting, led by  the client and observed and followed by the therapist, makes use of the client’s saccadically patterned eye movements, flitting here and there, pausing longer on some spots than others. This phenomenon  appears as if the client was accessing information on the inside by spontaneously gazing at positions on  the outside. When a client locks on a spot, orients to it with their eyes and perhaps their body, it is clear  that something meaningful and dynamic is occurring. Yet it is so natural and ever-present that we tend  not to notice it in others and ourselves. Perhaps that is what is most compelling about Gazespotting.  Similar to Outside Window and dissimilar to Inside Window, Gazespotting occurs outside of the client’s  awareness, making it more neuro than experiential, of course until we point it out to the client.  Brainspotting’s strategic and mindful use of three divergent ocular phenomena makes Brainspotting  unique among other healing modalities, including the many somatic and brain-based approaches. This  eye observing and interfacing strategy allows deep, direct, focused, access to subcortical and somatic  processes and provides a unique, powerful example of Brainspotting’s neuroexperiental model. 

The use of eye positions and the frame cohere to the Uncertainty Principal, which is the substructure of  Brainspotting, extending beyond the one to four quadrillion synaptic connections. In Brainspotting we say,  “in the face of uncertainty all we have is the frame.” The Uncertainty Principal follows the infinite,  unknowable nature of the macroscopic universes down to the minute, yet infinite, mysteries of the  microscopic universes. This reflects that everything inside us, down to subatomic level, bound together by  unseen forces, as well as everything outside of us, both infinitely complex and dynamic, expanding  beyond our imagination, is essentially unknowable and uncertain. If this conception sounds like it’s  verging on the spiritual, that’s because it is. It’s no secret that there are scientists who are deeply religious  and that quantum physics and spirituality increasingly dance together. Does this mean that the spiritual is  contained in the expansive frame of the neuro I am proposing? I will leave that up to each of you to  ponder this question and hopefully process it deeply. Thousands of years ago, peoples distributed around  the world developed their own conceptions of a higher power and religious ritual, even though they never  communicated or knew of each other’s existence. “You don’t have to know what it is to know that it is”. 

The Dual Attunement Frame, the structure of Brainspotting, takes the relational hold and focuses and  deepens it utilizing the eyes direct access to the subcortex and the spine. The relationship is primal and  archaic, evolving from the social engagement of primates and subprimates. As such, relationships are  somatic and experientially mostly out of our conscious awareness. The relationship, seen as being  psyche to psyche, is perhaps more precisely couched as subcortex to subcortex and soma to soma. Even  the utterances, tones and cadences of verbal communication are primarily subcortical expressions  molded into words and phrases by the neocortex. The watch words of Brainspotting, “where you look  affects how you feel”, inform the neuro of the neuroexperiential, as the retina, comprised of 100 million  neurons, is an extension of the brain that is formed embryonically from neural tissue. It is no surprise that  the reflexes expressed in the eyes, and the visual orienting system, reveal and provide instantaneous  access to subcortical processes. Accordingly, the Dual Attunement Frame, molded and held  simultaneously by the client and the therapist, is a central concept in both the neuro and experiential  aspects of the neuroexperiential model. 

The frame, painstakingly set up together with the client, step by step, both creates a space and focuses  and intensifies the systemic activation within the client. This heightened state leads to processing which in  Brainspotting is called Focused Mindfulness. This is both a portal and a process where subcortical processes flux and flow under the supported, open, curious observation of the client. Based on the 

complexity of the trauma inspired dissociative networks, the dynamic processing change may appear  rapid or incremental. In either case, it is observed and experienced by the client over the course of  minutes or hours, months or years. It is as if the neocortex is observing the mysterious subcortical  processes in real time, a true expression of vertical integration. This Focused Mindfulness is where the  deeply unconscious neuro processes transmute into conscious, neocortical awareness, the experiential of  the neuroexperiential. This awakening can emerge through the sensory, body sensations, memories,  emotions, insights, connections, awarenesses and releases. All systems are in action simultaneously,  fully organic and free of any contrivances. The Brainspotting therapist attempts to get into, and stay into,  the tail of this comet, which is not coincidentally an astronomical reference, in the context of this cosmic  phenomenon. The therapist, gracefully surrendering to Uncertainty, knows they can’t truly know what the  process is or where it’s going. All the therapist’s knowledge, wisdom, experience and intuitiveness are  gently pushed to the side, so as to valiantly have a chance to chase the vector of the client’s trajectory.  Unless the client is deeply destabilized and in need of grounding support, most non-Brainspotting  therapeutic interventions actually subvert the client’s subcortical journey, by diverting it towards the  neocortex. 

At either propitious junctures, or when edging close to a conclusion, we guide the client to “go back to the  beginning”, and once again attempt to revive the starting cause of activation. This is a profoundly  neurological process where the client tries to reactivate the original neural networks that now have been  transmuted by the frame-induced, sustained focused mindfulness. This is also a profoundly experiential  process where the client’s conscious, neocortex observes the sensory, affective and somatic changes.  The SUDs rating, subjective as identified in its name, draws upon the client’s computational abilities. It  should be noted that we rarely ask the client about what the change means to them, as Brainspotting is  about feeling and being, not about interpretation. It’s not unusual for the return to the beginning to yield a  response of, “something has changed but I can’t put it into words”. This too is a neocortical observation,  honoring that healing change can be undefinable and indescribable.  

One might ask, “how does the neuroexperiential model fit in with research?” I might answer, “how does  the neuroexperiential model fit into science?” Psychology has struggled to establish itself as a hard  science, in the face of physics, chemistry and mathematics. It might surprise you that there are zealots who don’t even consider biology a hard science. Single variable hypothesis testing studies are the  backbone of what has been designated as evidenced-based practice in psychology. The search for 

validity at a .05 or even .01 level is a rather narrow lens with which to view the activity within the one to  four quadrillion synaptic connections. The deeper we delve into the neuroexperiential model, the less it  looks like psychology, the more it looks like a less-western approach viewing the self through the body,  it’s systems and it’s fluid, dynamic awareness of itself. Based on uncertainty, presence, attunement,  

observation, connection, movement, and inevitable change, the neuroexperiential can be seen through a  variety of lenses. We shouldn’t eschew hypothesis testing research, but we shouldn’t be delimited by it.  The neuroexperiential can also be studied through the lens of biology, neuroanatomy, neuro ophthalmology, exploratory research, neuroscience of consciousness, Eastern medicine and practices  and the indigenous research paradigm. The neuroexperiential frame is expansive, encompassing,  dynamic, inclusive, permeable, never static, always evolving. 

In conclusion, the Neuroexperiential Model presents coherent conceptualizations and reflective language  for what we know, observe and do as Brainspotting frame holders. It doesn’t reject the current and  historical psychological and psychotherapeutic models of theory and practice, it builds on and expands  beyond them. The Neuroexperiential Model presents a mindful, expansive, inclusive, dynamic, evolving,  permeable frame that attempts to fit the healing needs of those who are drawn to us. The neuro reflects  an open, seeking, organic, culturally-attuned and respectful model of the nervous system integrated into  all body systems. The neuro recognizes the infinitely complex, perpetually dynamic, energy-infused and  driven nature of the human being. The experiential reflects our intuitive awareness of the neuro forces  that drive, guide and shape us. The experiential expresses the unity of our conscious awareness, our  internal and external environments, and their constant interplay. The neuroexperiential is who we are,  what we are, where we have been and where we are going.  

You may have noticed that I haven’t directly presented from my chosen title, “Brainspotting as a  Neuroexperiential Process for Healing and Expansion”. To be precise, the neuroexperiential is more of a  process than a model as it is fluid, dynamic and always evolving. The Greek philosopher Heraclitus said,  “No man steps in the same river twice, for it’s not the same river and he’s not the same man”. We are  always in process, whether inside the Brainspotting frame, or inside the cosmic frame. A model is a  snapshot of the moment, a compilation attempting to capture the moving narrative of human existence.  This limitation is certainly true of the Neuroexperiential Model, as well as all other models. And why did I  include “healing and expansion” in my title? The universe is inexorably expanding as are we in our own  internal universes. Healing is accordingly always an expansive process. The Brainspotting frame, 

received from and held with the client, focuses, contains and propels this expansive, neuroexperiential  healing. The destination is always unknown because there is no destination. Healing is a process, and an  expansive one at that.  

What I have presented today is an invitation for you to receive, process and then make your own  contributions to. The Neuroexperiental Model is a preliminary, flexible scaffolding intended to be woven  upon by those inside and outside of the Brainspotting fold. As it is organic, multisystemic and evolving, it  will never be a fixed model easily researched. It is grounded in the clinical sciences, what we all have  collectively learned about the human systems, and what the sciences East and West have taught us  about life as we know it. This presentation is intended to undergird every conference workshop that  follows during the coming three days. You already have it in writing so feel free to review, reflect and  discuss it. Thank you for your time, presence and attention.